According to in-store data from Grips Intelligence, Ticonderoga generated the vast majority of its revenue through Amazon, which accounted for 90.8% of total revenue share between January and May 2026, with Office Depot capturing the remaining 9.1%. The brand's average product price during this period stood at $8.73, reflecting a 2.0% overall increase in average pricing over the tracked months. Despite this price growth, Ticonderoga experienced a 3.8% decline in total revenue over the same timeframe, suggesting softening demand even as prices edged higher. The brand's heavy concentration on a single retailer for over 90% of its revenue highlights a significant channel dependency that could present both risks and opportunities. These trends point to a brand navigating a challenging market environment with limited retail diversification across the two tracked retailers.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 4% from Mar to May.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 2% from Mar to May.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Ticonderoga on Amazon.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Ticonderoga.
BY REVENUE
Ticonderoga sells 89% online and 11% offline. Online runs through 1 channel; offline through 1. Online share has moved from 3% in Jan to 92% in May.
Online
89%
11%
Offline
Online channels
89%
Offline channels
11%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 3.59M ratings on 2 channels, Ticonderoga averages 4.8★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.8–5.0 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.8
/ 5
From 3.59M ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$14.85
Price
$279K
Revenue
$6.39
Price
$251K
Revenue
$50.41
Price
$232K
Revenue
$39.87
Price
$141K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis