Grips Intelligence in-store data covering January 1 to July 31, 2026 across menards.com, Amazon, lowes.com, homedepot.com and acehardware.com shows Mean Green, a brand under Rust-Oleum parent RPM International (NYSE: RPM), operating with a highly concentrated retail footprint. Menards alone drives 58.2% of year-to-date revenue, followed by Amazon at 23.7% and Lowe's at 12.0%, leaving Home Depot (3.4%) and Ace Hardware (2.8%) as marginal contributors. Average product price sits at $5.85 year to date, though pricing has climbed sharply in recent months, rising 22.9% across the May–July window to $6.82 and gaining 9.7% month over month in the latest period. That pricing momentum has not translated into growth, with revenue down 6.8% over the same three-month stretch and slipping a further 2.0% in the most recent month. The divergence points to volume softness offsetting higher realized prices, a dynamic worth monitoring given the brand's dependence on a single dominant retail channel.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 7% from May to Jul.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 23% from May to Jul.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Mean Green on Ace Hardware.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Mean Green.
BY REVENUE
Mean Green sells 39% online and 61% offline. Online runs through 3 channels; offline through 2. Online share has moved from 38% in Mar to 48% in Jul.
Online
39%
61%
Offline
Online channels
39%
Offline channels
61%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 13K ratings on 5 channels, Mean Green averages 4.4★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.4–4.6 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.4
/ 5
From 13K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis